Blog

The tariff landscape remains as dynamic as ever, with court rulings, refund programs, new investigations, and additional trade actions continuing to shape international commerce. From IEEPA refund opportunities to ongoing Section 232 and Section 301 investigations, importers have a lot to keep track of. This overview highlights where current tariff programs stand and what developments may be on the horizon. Understanding these changes can help you better assess risk, control costs, and plan ahead.

It feels like we’re living in a never-ending cycle of “Breaking News” alerts when it comes to IEEPA tariffs, and now Section 122 headlines have joined the party. After SCOTUS ruled the IEEPA tariffs unlawful, the big unanswered question has been refunds for importers. Now the Court of International Trade has ordered CBP to issue them, but CBP says it needs new ACE functionality first. Here’s what importers should be doing now to prepare.

Most of us would never think that export compliance would have anything to do with "the world's leading sports education brand," yet IMG Academy recently settled for $1,720,000 to resolve 89 violations of OFAC counternarcotics sanctions. Between 2019 and 2025, IMG accepted tuition payments from 2 individuals designated under the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act with zero due diligence performed. Academic institutions are not immune to sanctions risk, and this case proves it.

Your customs bond is your financial handshake with the U.S. Government, and if it's wrong, your cargo stops and your supply chain is halted. With insufficient bonds reaching 27,479 in fiscal 2025 and a combined value soaring to almost $3.6 billion, this is not something you can ignore until CBP sends you a demand letter. Let's break down what a customs bond really is and what to do if your bond is deemed insufficient.

The Supreme Court has issued its long-awaited decision on President Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs and in a 6–3 ruling, the Court held that the statute does not authorize tariffs during peacetime emergencies. The opinion leans heavily on constitutional separation of powers and the major questions doctrine, reinforcing that tariff authority rests with Congress. While the decision could carry significant financial consequences for importers, the Court did not rule on whether refunds will be required. Here’s what the ruling means and what questions still remain.

Just last week I was reminded of an experience I had at a previous employer when we received a frantic call about an Emergency Action Notification (EAN) from U.S. Customs & Border Protection. The EAN stated that a shipment was held due to invasive species being found — and the only options were to Treat the shipment (fumigate), re-export, or destroy the shipment. Shipments with infestations or even evidence of pests can be costly and disrupt your imports. So as an importer, how do you respond to an Emergency Action Notification?

Having an EAR99 export classification is usually seen as favorable and often allows for No License Required (NLR) exports. But when distributors won’t share end-use or end-user information, exporters can still be exposed to risk. If you know your items will be resold, due diligence means making sure your company is not enabling a violation of export regulations. This article looks at how the EAR defines “support” and why gaps in due diligence can create real compliance issues.